|
Where Are the Close
Encounters?
By Mark Rodeghier
Source:
International UFO Reporter (IUR); (August 2006); V30
No4, pp 26-27
Those
of us who follow the ebb and flow of raw UFO reports,
whether to MUFON or CUFOS, or to well-known websites,
including the National UFO Reporting Center, have come
to recognize the drop in close encounters. Whether it
is physical trace events or a good old fashioned CE3
with the sighting of a humanoid, these cases seem much
less frequent now-a-days.
The
latest report from Chris Rutkowski’s Canadian UFO
Survey (survey.canadianuforeport.com) confirms this
trend. Figure 1 shows the number of reports received
each year across Canada. For whatever reason, reports
in general have greatly increased in this decade,
although the total dropped a bit in 2005. There are
far more UFOs reported now than in the 1990s in
Canada. The same is generally true for the United
States, although perhaps with not as great an increase
since 2000.
What
about close encounters? Have they followed the same
trend? Figure 2 provides the answer.

The
number of reports is much smaller – only about 4% of
reports are close encounters over the 17-year period
in Canada – so there are larger relative swings from
year to year. But close encounters generally do
increase, beginning in the current decade, although
not to the higher levels of the 1990s.
But
is this the whole story? I’d suggest not, I and
colleagues have noticed that close encounters are not
as common, compared to other cases. To investigate
this, we need to look at the percentage of all
sightings that are close encounters.
Figure
3 shows the percentage of all reports that are close
encounters, by year. It is immediately evident that
our sense of the data has been correct. There has been
a fairly steady drop in the percentage of close
encounters since the first year of the Canadian survey
in 1989. Close encounters now comprise only about 2
percent of all reports.

What
does it all mean? Are UFOs reluctant to come near to
witnesses? Do they no longer land? Since witnesses
generally can’t seek out a UFO close encounter, it
would seem that influences beyond witness behavior
would be underlying this trend. Still, if witnesses
were now more likely to report distant events of
lights in the sky, but less likely to report close
encounters, we would see the same pattern. But I can’t
easily imagine why that disparity would be true.
This
pattern is further evidence that the characteristics
of the UFO phenomenon are not fixed and immutable. The
appearance and behavior of the phenomenon has changed
quite a bit over time (e.g., from disks to triangles),
and this change is one of the latest examples. It
would certainly be interesting to see data for other
countries to see if this trend holds more broadly.
|