|
For The Record
The Edwards AFB Case & Astronaut
Gordon Cooper
By Brad Sparks
The Edwards AFB case is in the Blue Book files Case No. 4715.
I don't have a copy but Tom Tulien and others do. McDonald discussed
it in his 1968 House Science & Astronautics UFO Symposium testimony
(in the long submitted document of best cases, Case 41, pp. 75, 85).
That's where I first heard of it. McDonald found out because he was
speaking in northern California and met Frank Baker who was the supervisor
of Bittick and Gettys (not Cooper whom they knew nothing about).
See McDonald's presentation (the actual date was May 2 not 3).
McDonald's Presentation
I really do not think there were two separate cases, one involving
Gordon Cooper. Cooper's reference to a "camera crew" means they
had the camera, and Bittick and Gettys said it was the Askania at Site
#4.
Cooper made up a story years later and claimed HE sent the camera
crew out. The camera crew and their actual boss (Baker) said they never
heard of Cooper!
Bittick and Gettys said it got as close as 500 yards which
makes it a borderline CE case. Bittick and Gettys said they radioed
their report as it happened in order to try to get other camera crews
onto it for triangulation but no one else was set up or manning the other
sites -- it was 6:55 AM, and they had gotten there early because their boss
Frank Baker had sent them out early (they later, with McDonald, wrongly
remembered it was just before 8 AM presumably because that is when tracking
operations were normally supposed to begin and other camera crews did not
get in place until just before 8 so at 6:55-7:20 there was nobody else
to track it).
The case is in the Blue Book files. Moreover there
is an analysis by a Col. Klein (Kline?) at Edwards AFB in the BB file
that destroys the balloon explanation and rejects it based on the known
tracking of the balloon.
Cooper was a nobody in 1957!!! His name wouldn't have
meant beans to anyone then! He wasn't selected for the Mercury
program until 1959 -- two years later.
The case was published a week after it happened, in the
LA TIMES of May 9, 1957, (and in an INS wire service dispatch then) long
before Cooper came along. Cooper did not reveal the case or blow
the lid on any coverup. If anything Cooper has almost ruined
the case.
The most likely explanation is a storytelling mentality of exaggerating roles
and details, where no one can predict in advance how much alteration
the story will get. Cooper probably did see the film and got a garbled
story second or third or nth-handed and exaggerated it even more in his
mind in the retelling to juice it up.
But there may be more to it than just embellishment. Cooper's exaggeration
of a real case, falsely turning it into a filmed landing with landing
gear retracting on takeoff, is very similar to the pattern of Air Force
OSI fabrications of other real UFO cases with false landings and aliens
using AF officers usually at about the rank of Colonel and designed to
discredit the case (Bentwaters 1980 is the classic). Cooper was an
AF officer and I think retired at rank of full Colonel. Cooper first
came out with his phony story about 1978, exactly when AFOSI began a new
wave of fabricated UFO stories in an effort to head off what was feared
to be another massive UFO flap, this time triggered by the blockbuster
CEIII movie.
Edwards AFB like White Sands was a test range and not
a 24/7 air defense base. Radars were turned on in the mornings for
test range activities and turned off at the end of a work
day, typically 8-5 operations, a work day, no reason to keep going after
5, everyone's tired and wanting to go home, and no reason to start up in
the night either unless a special project required it. Hence there
were probably no radars on at 6:55-7:20 AM. However if there was
a jet interception attempted it was done visually and most likely it was
done too late, and the object was gone. Again it was not an air defense
base, no jets were fueled and ready on "strip alert," it would have taken
time to get a jet ready and up in the air before the day's operations (had
the incident taken place after jets were fueled and ready, in mid-day
some time, then a faster jet response could have been undertaken, or a
jet might have been in the air already, etc.).
Cooper's born-again ETH-belief seems to emerge out of nowhere about
1978.
|