Estimate of the Situation: 2007 Francis Ridge As we celebrate a half-century of monumental investigation
and
research by the National Investigations Committee on Aerial Phenomena
(NICAP) and the 9th Year Anniversary of the fully authorized web site
on Dec. 15, 2006,
I'd like to ponder where we are and how it use to be. I began my quest
with NICAP in November of 1960 with the authorization of my seven-man
NICAP Subcommittee team, Indiana Unit #1 at Vincennes, Indiana. We had
no computers, no fax machines, no cell phones. All we had were old
typewriters, bulky and expensive tape recorders, and pay-per copy Zerox
copiers. Sighting data was recorded on a Form 97 and some attached
notes, and primary data was kept on 3x5 cards. Reports were acquired by
checking into news releases, and national and global incident
information updates came four times a year in the form of the NICAP
publication, "The UFO Investigator". We were in a sighting lull and
there
were only sporadic local sightings for us to work with. By 1963 the car
chases and low-level sightings began to be reported and we had a local
sighting concentration in S. Illinois and S. Indiana, which included
E-M effects. In 1964 the landings were being reported, beginning with
the Socorro, NM case.
By August of that year I had to report for TDY (temporary
active duty) with the U.S. Army at Fort Knox, KY. My basic training and
AIT ended in December and I returned to my home town to serve out the
6-year hitch with the Army National Guard. While at Fort Meade, MD, the
famous Pack River radar incident took place, but I didn't know about it
until January. Sightings started to pick up. By 1970 we had portable
cassette recorders and the MADAR detection unit I built in 1960 was
operating round-the-clock. I had job transfers in 1971, 1972, and 1973,
landing me in Mt. Vernon, IN right smack into the UFO wave that hit
hard in the fall of 1973. Was I prepared? Not really. NICAP had
declined and I had become a State Section Director for MUFON and I was
a stranger in a strange land. I had no local consultants or field
investigators right after my job transfer. But armed with all that I
DID have I logged preliminary incident reports on my Form M (Message
Slip) from telephone reports submitted by citizens, airport tower
controllers, and law enforcement. I took advantage of the media every
chance I got. I was pro-UFO and you could tell it. I wasn't pretending,
but I also think that's what it took to get the media and the public to
cooperate.
By that time I had had 13 years in the field doing
investigation and I had done onsite investigations talking personally
to witnesses. I knew who was full of it and I knew when they were
serious. I knew there was a lot of "noise" out there, but I also knew
there was "signal". My experience began with one advisor in 1960 who
had worked on Project Saucer (code-named "SIGN") and he was the one who
helped me build the forerunner of MADAR, my "Magnetic Anomaly Detection
And Recording" system. Project SIGN had been aware that SOME UFOs
produced
electromagnetic fields. During those first years I investigated some
incredible reports by credible people. Something was flying around in
our skies and NICAP and MUFON knew they were not "ours". It wasn't
until a few years later that many researchers were able to use the
Freedom of Information Act and a deluge of documents were in our hands.
What had I learned by that point? Besides knowing that there
was something operating in our skies that wasn't ours, the government
was only giving us want they couldn't, or didn't need, to hide. I had
seen jets chase UFOs and later had a close encounter of my own.
By 1985 I got caught up in the computer age and started
putting what I had accumulated in 25 years into a useable database.
Before it was over I had over 4,000 entries from six midwest states. I
had also taken advantage of all the sources and newsletters all over
the country to create a "UFO Intelligence Summary", a chronological
listing of events for researchers to see what was going on and where.
It was extremely helpful for the MADAR Project because the printout was
my intelligence source, comparable to a printout of flight plans and
conventional radar. When MADAR was triggered, I needed a sighting
printout. It worked perfect and in 1977 we hit pay dirt.
In 1986 I became the State Director for Indiana and I
trained over a hundred and fifty people, always having at least two
dozen Field Investigators with all of Indiana's 92 counties covered. My
personal contact with witnesses was much less, but my FI's were doing a
great
job. Indiana had its share of good reports, the best ones even before I
came on the scene. Indiana had always been hot. (See my book, "Regional
Encounters: The FC Files")
UFOs were more of a strange topic in the media in the 1950's
and proponents were somewhat rare. But we were right. I got interested
in 1956 when I read Captain Edward J. Ruppelt's book, "Report on
Unidentified Flying Objects" and I was definitely hooked. But I still
remember the groans of the skeptics and the Air Force. If you want to
find out how bad it was, and how ridiculous the subject was treated
THEN, just purchase some of the CDs Wendy Connors has amassed these
last few years. We are much better off now than we were then. Today,
most people believe UFOs are real. They just don't care, or better yet,
they are not afraid of an invasion, even with all the abduction stuff
that has come out in the last few decades.
But at the very beginning, the credibility or reliability of
witnesses was the main point for attack. "If only we had sightings by
reliable sources." We knew they had that, but it was years later before
we had documents showing just how serious Project SIGN was and how the
September 1947 conclusion "the reported phenomena are real", was
reached. If you look at civilian reports all day long, you will wonder
all day long, and a few will make you sit up and take notice. We have
over 150,000 such sightings on UFOCAT.
The Air Force Project Blue Book closed down in 1969
with 701 "Unknowns" still listed. The NICAP site has a list that
comprises 564 of those cases so 137 are missing. However, as Brad
Sparks has pointed out, "they are not actually "missing". We just don't
know for sure which ones they are of the IFO ("Identified") cases in
the BB files. Project Blue Book's last director, Lt. Col. Hector
Quintanilla changed a lot of the old historical UNK's into IFOs without
updating the old stats. By going through the BB files in his research,
Sparks found more cases to add to the actual unknowns he had already
culled, making the total over 1500 cases, twice as many as the Air
Force came up with.
The sightings that impress me the most are close encounters
rather than distant ones, but Nocturnal Lights and Daylight Discs
(objects beyond 500') can be important evidence when used in
conjunction with good close encounters or radar cases. But these are
not reported enough with incontrovertible witnesses to satisfy my
desire for good scientific evidence.
In my research studies and data printouts I converted the
eleven MUFON Form numbers for special evidence cases (whether they were
actually used or not) into two-digit computer code numbers, to catalog
the types of UFO sightings in a computer database. Forms 1 thru
11 provided Category Numbers from 1-11.
My main thrust for data on the NICAP site, and scientific
evidence for supporting serious research into the subject, is the
sightings by pilots from aircraft. These were Category 11, since that
supplementary form number was the one used by MUFON in addition to the
primary questionnaire, Form 1 (which was comprised of most of the
information). Major Keyhoe's
books and the NICAP UFO Evidence are full of aerial encounters, and
that's what got me into this business in the first place. Pilots up
where UFOs are, and sometimes with the objects between them and the
ground, with witnesses knowing their environment, far outweigh distant
ground sightings by average civilians. Over 3,000 sightings have been
catalogued by Dr. Richard Haines. Dominique Weinstein has catalogued
over 1400 such cases. It is hard for me to select one case as an
example because there are so many good ones and you have seen some of
them at one time or another. Needless to say the history of UFOlogy is
full of extremely interesting aircraft cases. The NICAP site houses
over 200 incidents.
Cat 10 events are those involving nuclear radiation, and
these are, as one would expect even if we are dealing with ET,
extremely rare. Right after I set up the NICAP site my interest in
special cases led me to the ones that had a possible nuclear
connection. When I set up the Nuclear Connection Project I had Larry
Hatch run a computer search on his vast "U" database and he was able
to
identify and select over 200 incidents, "flagged" as potential nuclear
connection incidents. So Category 10 now includes the most
interesting incidents yet, cases where UFOs shut down Titan missiles or
overflew nuclear facilities. One such case investigated by Dr. James
McDonald was witnessed by two tower controllers at Kirtland Air Force
Base, New Mexico. Interesting enough, the object was an inverted egg
about the size of a small sedan and hovered right over the runway. But
guess
what? That case laid in the files for decades. But thanks to NCP
researchers we noted that the object had over-flown Manzano Mountain, a
major weapons and missile storage area. The UFO flew right-to-left
along the East-West runway, then turned SW toward the tower, stopping
near the nuclear weapons storage area for about a minute. McDonald
mentioned that the UFO stopped near the Kirtland "Drumhead Area" where
the B-58 operated. If the object hovering near a WSA (Weapons Storage
Area) didn't get your attention, the B-58 Hustler was a week away from
a nuclear qualification run, and not far from where new weapons of mass
destruction were moved by aircraft to the bomb test sites.
In regard to Category 10, very briefly, soon after we
dropped two atomic bombs on 200,000 people and then started working on
new delivery systems from captured German V-2's, the UFO waves began.
According to documents secured under the FOIA, the sightings occurred
over secret bomb design and production facilities, then shifted to bomb
storage areas. In the summer of 1947, in a six week period, there were
thousands of sightings in the United States (Ted Bloecher catalogued
853 cases and about half were daylight disc sightings) that came to a
sudden halt with the reported crash of a UFO a Roswell, New Mexico.
At some point right after the UFOs began being reported,
somebody said "if somebody would just pick up one of these things on
radar...." Some of the best cases we DO have are radar cases, Category
9. There are over 500 cases reported, many of them well-documented. I
had complied a list of over a hundred from the UFO Evidence and further
research, but there are now over 230 listed on the NICAP site. Skeptics
demanded radar cases with visual back-up. Plenty of those were
documented too, and Dominique Weinstein has over 76 radar/visuals
onsite. One less dramatic incident was written off by the Air Force as
inexperienced radar operators, followed by T-33 pilots chasing a
balloon. Our researchers found documents and evidence abound that
proved the object, a domed disc, was a bonified UFO. The updated,
upgraded, Fort Monmouth, NJ case was a major discovery that laid
dormant for 50 years and written off by almost everybody, skeptics and
UFO proponents alike.
Category 8 incidents are those involving photographic
evidence, sometimes motion pictures. This list now includes videos. My
latest report from top photo researcher, Vicente-Juan Ballester Olmos,
and the Anomaly Foundation which developed FOTOCAT ( a world-wide
catalog of UFO and IFO photographic cases) was that as of of May of
2006, FOTOCAT had over 7,000 cases on file.
Re-investigation of many of these cases has turned up some
real gems. The Trent (McMinnville, Oregon) case was even declared so by
the University of Colorado. But the real surprise was the Trindade
Island case. What was usually depicted as a grainy and blurry
saturn-shaped object in thousands of UFO pulp magazines, when viewed in
the original plates, turns out to be a blockbuster. The distant object
when blown up, gets better and better. What a lot of people don't know
is that the IGY ship had over 200 people on it, and 60 of them (or
more) saw the object themselves as it approached the island, circled
and left. Thanks to Wendy Connors and CUFOS we now have the recording
of Barauna
(the primary witness and photographer), interviewed by none other than
Dr. J. Allen Hynek. Fifteen minutes before the structured saucer with a
dome arrived, it was tracked on the ship's radar. Very few people in
the
UFOlogical community knew this. And if that's not enough, the ship's
power went off when the object approached and was restored after it
left.
The NICAP site spends less time on Category 7 simply because
of priorities, but this group of incidents represent UFO reports
involving humanoids or entities, which includes many abduction cases.
David Web has investigated hundreds of such cases and published reports
on them. In April of 2007 we will be releasing our report on the
world-wide sighting wave of 1973, the year of the humanoids.
Category 6 is extremely interesting because it involves over
5600 Physical Trace Cases (CUFOS). This group of Close Encounters (also
referred to as CE-II) tell us that many objects are about 30' in
diameter, the number that keeps coming up in size estimates from
sightings all over the world. 4104 of that old list involve UFO
sightings, not just ground traces. Cat 6 include the vast Roswell file
and almost everyone is convinced that something very strange happened
at Roswell, and almost no one believes the object was any kind of
balloon.
Category 5 is one that takes in other categories as well in
some cases, and is one of the groups much neglected, again because of
priorities. Out time is limited and other categories demand more
attention. Category 5 represent Medical cases, Psychological or
Physiological, and involve illness or injury due to UFO encounters. A
lot of Cat 5's are really Cat 7's, abduction reports.
Category 4 is a once-neglected group. Animal Effects are
very important evidence for several reasons. The effects themselves are
worth noting, but the fact that animals don't hallucinate and react to
the same stimulus as humans is important evidence. An extremely capable
and dedicated woman by the name of Joan Woodward is an authority on
such cases and has compiled hundreds of animal reaction incidents, many
of which are already on the NICAP site.
Cat 3 events have been a primary interest of mine from the
beginning because they involve Electromagnetic Effects (E-M). One
hundred and six cases were listed in the NICAP UFO Evidence report in
1964. Later, Mark Rodeghier of CUFOS compiled a list of over 500 cases.
And Dr. Richard Haines has over 185 cases listed among his 3,000
sightings from aircraft. The early list compiled by NICAP was enough to
convince me there was an urgent need to set up a detection station. And
I had the perfect man to help to do it, the scientist from Project
SIGN. The NICAP site now lists over 250 cases.
The MUFON Forms 1 & 2 were used for investigation and
computer input, respectively. So I converted these numbers into
computer classification codes for what I had left. Simple distant
objects (Daylight Discs and Nocturnal Lights) became Category 1.
Close encounters (ones that didn't require the special evidence
forms mentioned above) were Category 2.
For those who say we still don't have anything, they are
either
not looking or they are looking in the wrong place or at the wrong
data. This extreme minority isn't made up of die-hard skeptics. They
are some of the best people we have in the field. They just have their
shield set too high. A very good, level-headed friend of mine, who has
a lot of respect for me, does not believe in UFOs. If he would see one
of the more high-strangeness or normal UFO types, he would merely write
them off as something we just don't understand, or something normal
seen under unusual conditions. If he saw an actual domed flying saucer,
500 feet away, that hovered and then shot off at high speed, he would
say, "Now, that's one of our babies". In other words, if it is
nebulous, it's nothing. If it's real, it's ours. ET's are impossible
for these types of people. Well, somebody is/was flying machines whose
performance we still can't duplicate to this day, over 60 years ago.
Even before that. It now appears that we have at least one bonified UFO
amidst all the "noise" of the wave of 1897.
So, we have people who look at 60 years of UFO sightings and
the last half of that period being very poor with less-detailed
incidents, and those who study the best cases we had before the lid
went down in 1953 when the CIA wrecked the UFO investigation. Some of
these people haven't conducted a great deal of personal field
investigation. Many have spent considerable time looking at documents,
however, and they are experts in their field and we appreciate all that
they have done. This is a vast, time-consuming, inquiry. But I don't
believe we have gotten below the tip of the iceberg. If this is
something real, and I for one am sure that part of it is, nothing that
proves this is going to get released or be easy to find. It is
understandable that if this is all as big as it now appears, we only
have what somebody wants us to have. We might even find out that
forcing it out might be a big mistake. Our desperate need to know may
not be justified in this very unstable world we live in. But some of us
have peeked through the keyhole and simply walking away just doesn't
work. The implications for the human race are just too big. We're not
alone.
|
|