
|
Hi Carl and Francis,
I have attached documents that took me nearly ten
years to get through FOIA. Though it might be out
there already somewhere in the public domain, the
records I got this from have been classified since
1948! Apparently, I’m the first to access these from
the Archives. But you never know what sleuths like
Jan Aldrich has already uncovered, via another
depository, as many copies were usually distributed
to different agencies.
Upon first read of the first page, please note that it
seems a submarine was observed. But on the second page
(3rd sighting), oddly, it says: "The shape of the
vessel as described by the pilot of #1 sighting, who
sighted an object which resembled a submarine." Key
phrase here: "resembled a submarine." This clearly
presents a very different picture. The 4th sighting
uses the word "appeared" in its description. As I've
mentioned in /Strange Company/ and during my lectures,
terminology was a significant factor when determining
if the witness actually observed a known object or if
the witnessed observed something that looked like
something familiar. Air wise, flares and jets were a
significant issue, now and then. Of course, all this
is strengthened by the report's title, "Unusual
Sightings Along Aleutian Chain." There may be nothing to this report, other than a
Russian submarine conducting reconnaissance.
Nonetheless, I thought it interesting.
|