
As the author and investigator in the most exhaustive
investigation of the RB-47 case ever conducted, which demolished Klass'
entire explanatory scheme, I have to disagree with these
characterizations of Klass' investigation of the case and his
explanations (many of which were based on BB's original ideas in 1957).
Klass did an excellent investigation, far above and beyond
anything typically done in the UFOlogy community or even by himself,
and of relatively high standards and very impressive, very convincing
unless you knew where he made his mistakes. It wasn't "illogical"
it was just mistaken. It was not perfect and it was not
complete. It was a difficult undertaking. Klass being a
journalist helped in some ways and hurt in others. He was
outright lied to by George Rappaport former director of the AF
Electronic Warfare Center who told him there was no conceivable
electronic warfare reason for imitating a CPS-6B radar like the UFO did
in this case -- well he blatantly misled Klass because the Soviets'
entire air defense radar network in the 50's was based on its P-20
Token radar imitating our CPS-6B radar.
In hindsight Klass should have challenged Rappaport but
instead he was totally fooled by him and never knew better, and that is
understandable, since having such a high-ranking official make such an
absolute assertion like that can be very blinding. One would have
to be very well informed on highly classified matters of ELINT
intelligence to even conceive of how this assertion could be
wrong. Klass was suckered and it actually hurt his own skeptical
case. Had he pursued it and found out the truth he might have
been able to put together a more plausible explanation of the RB-47
case (that it might have had something to do with electronic warfare
regarding Soviet air defenses being simulated using our own radars the
Soviets had imitated). That explanation would still have been
wrong but it would have been better than the ones he put forward.
But he never challenged Rappaport.
You can have an excellent investigation and still be
wrong. Klass was wrong. He did a thorough investigation but
it was incomplete. No one in the UFOlogical community directly
challenged Klass except me (and independently Martin Shough but not
directly to Klass), because Klass' investigation was obviously very
impressive, seemingly thorough and very convincing.
Klass had the insight to see that the Duncanville CPS-6B
radar (actually the FPS-10 version) had been detected by the ELINT
equipment aboard the RB-47. He thought that solved the case and
that ALL the radar signals had been due to the Duncanville radar.
In fact his insight did the exact opposite -- it proved the absolute
impossibility of the Duncanville radar causing the UFO radar signals,
which were ALSO detected simultaneously with the Duncanville radar
signals but 30 degrees away from each other. Klass overlooked the
fact that the simultaneous detection of the two radar signals from two
different directions matched the location of the UFO and Duncanville
and thus proved they were different, also showed that the UFO was
moving faster than the 600 mph RB-47 exactly as the RB-47 crew had
testified. His attempted explanation thus becomes just about the
strongest evidence for unexplainable UFO reality ever recorded.
Klass and McDonald and everyone else were also misled by a
mistake by the RB-47 pilot Col Chase who misremembered the navigation
data when filling out a BB report form 2 months after the
sighting. Chase thought they had followed a 265 True heading when
it fact that was the Magnetic heading. Decades of research on the
case were warped and misled by this error, which resulted in
absurdities such as Klass having a flight map that showed the subsonic
RB-47 traveling supersonic at Mach 2 at one point (a fudging that was
necessary to fit the warped flight path caused by Col Chase''s error on
the flight heading). McDonald's map and CUFOS' map were also
wrong and nearly identical to Klass' map.
When I realized the error and corrected it back in 1997, it
made all the sighting angles match perfectly, thus proving that the UFO
and Duncanville were separate and accurately located by the ELINT
receivers on the RB-47. The sighting angles had made no sense
prior to that, and thus enabled Klass to get away with fuzzy
assumptions that it all fit the ground radar and that no UFO was
involved. Clarity and accuracy is what proved the UFO, contrary
to skeptic propaganda that UFO's only exist in a shadow realm of poor
data and inaccuracy.
Klass interviewed the pilot, Col Chase, and thought that
Chase's annotations of the flight path on a map were all he
needed. After all, Chase was the pilot. He didn't realize
that Chase had made a mistake and that he should have rethought the
navigation issues and should have tried to locate and interview the
navigator (duh!), Major Hanley. By the time I located and
interviewed Hanley too much time had passed and he no longer remembered
anything specific enough to help with the case analysis. In
hindsight, when things didn't fit on Chase's map or the map in the BB
file, Klass should have pushed more on the navigation issue. But
so should have McDonald, so it's hard to pin the blame entirely on
Klass.
Klass' array of detailed technical explanations of the RB-47
case constitute the most impressive skeptical UFO explanations and the
most in-depth skeptic investigation ever carried out. Had they
been mere debunker inventions they would not have helped build the case
for UFO reality, but would have dissolved into nonsense. So it is
something of a backhanded tribute to Klass' efforts that his work
helped establish the case as a UFO, rather than the triumphant proof of
UFO's "always" breaking down into IFO's upon investigation as debunkers
like to trumpet.
Brad
Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2010 14:39:46 -0400
From: Don Ledger
<dledger@NS.SYMPATICO.CA>
Subject: Re: RB-47 Case: RADCAT
How do you feel about Klass's claim that upon presenting his
theories to the
RB-47 crew that they agreed with him that this case was a
series of
coincidences.
Quote from Wiki at:
"Klass presented that interpretation to the RB-47 crew, who
agreed that the
'UFOs' were the product of human error & excitement
combined with ghost
echoes on the radar."
Don Ledger
Don,
That was Peter Brookesmith's claim quoted on WIkipedia, not
quoting Klass. Brookesmith claimed that Klass said "the RB-47
crew" agreed the case was entirely explained now. But I can't
find anywhere that Klass said that "the crew" had said that.
Klass quoted from letters he received from only 2 of the 6 crew
members. Saying that "the crew" agreed makes it sound like the
entire "crew" of 6 agreed. As I recall the pilot. Col Chase, was
later contacted by Gert Herb of CUFOS and clarified that Klass'
explanation was plausible but not that he agreed that Klass had
successfully explained the case (I would have to look it all up again
to get exact quotes).
You missed quoting the next sentence from Brookesmith on
Wikipedia "ghost echoes on the radar. This is a key item in Klass's
analysis." Obviously Brookesmith doesn't grasp the fundamentals
of the case and doesn't understand the difference between radar and
radar detectors (ELINT) that merely listen passively to radar and
doesn't transmit anything. It isn't about radar, radar is not the
"key item" in Klass' analysis. It's ELINT (called euphemistically
"ECM" in Klass' book).
Klass pushed his case endorsements for propaganda victory
points and Brookesmith pushed them even farther. But the rug is
fully pulled out from under them.
Brad
|