11-06-1973
Strange Object’s Maneuvers Near Nuclear
Shipbuilding Disturb Navy
By Robert B Klinn and David Branch Exclusive To The Register
PASCAGOULA,
Miss. --- As a first step apparently highly serious
operation to determine the cause and nature of a
submerged, metallic, beam-emitting,
disappearing-reappearing, course-changing object
seen maneuvering Tuesday evening, Nov. 6, in the
Pascagoula River, the U.S. Navy Friday dispatched to
the site of the mystery Lt. Cmdr. Craig Dorman of
the Naval Coastal Systems Laboratory at Panama City,
Florida. These columnists learned Monday that this
Navy’s concern stems from the proximity of the
observations to the Navy’s nuclear shipbuilding
activitiesapproximately 200 yards away.
In a
comprehensive report being written by Dorman and to
be released next week, the Navy is expected to
disclose that it has absolutely no idea what the
object is (or was) in the Pascagoula River.
Dorman is
part of the Navy’s Seal Team, an underwater
demolition, combat-trained, airborne killer unit.
His trip to Mississippi was especially for this
mission. Early Friday morning at the Coast Guard
base at Mobile, Ala., Dorman met with Coast Guard
Lt. (j.g.) Michael Donohoe. They proceeded to
Pascagoula, where together they debriefed the
witnesses---seven civilians and two military
personnel.
According to
Donohoe, with whom we spoke Monday, “The Navy was
basically caught off guard. The Navy believes the
observed object is something totally new and
differenttotally unknown. We were caught unaware
and want to prevent it from happening again.”
Donohoe said the Navy intends to be ready
scientifically for another such sighting and is
presently preparing capability in the Pascagoula
River Area.
“The basic
purpose is to document this story from start to
finish,” said Donohoe, referring to Lt. Cmdr.
Dorman’s mission. “Something in the water is causing
that illumination. It remains an unidentified
object, and we want to maintain a file as a
reference for any future sighting,” The Navy, he
said, is engaged in an objective and scientific
approach toward bringing its full facilities to bear
on the river area.
We note that
such an approach represents a totally different
attitude from that which has been displayed since
1949 by Air Force personnel in their UFO
investigations.
The Navy’s
complete report is expected to show where the Navy’s
nuclear shipbuilding activitiesa function of
Ingalls Shipbuilding, a subdivision of Litton
Industriestakes place with relation to the location
of the sightings.
Friday,
United Press International, in a story based on an
early Coast Guard press report, told of the first
Tuesday-night (Nov. 6), river-object sightings by
twin brothers Raymond and Rayme Ryan, who were
fishing on the Pascagoula River. An illuminated
object was following their boat, and repeated
efforts to beat the object away with an oar made the
light grow dimmer. The UPI story noted that
Pascagoula Coast Guard officers in a 16-foot boat
had subsequently located the object in four to six
feet of water and moving at four to six knots, but
that they were unable to retrieve it because it
would seem to go out and move away and then
reappear. The story quoted the Coast Guard press
report description of the object as “an amber beam,
four to six inches in diameter, attached to a bright
metal object.”
Neither the
Coast Guard press report nor the UPI story named the
officers of the Coast Guard vessel who had witnessed
and pursued the object. Neither the Coast Guard
press report nor the UPI story was based on a direct
interview with the Coast Guard witnesses. Monday, we
tracked down and by telephone interviewed these
witnessesPO Charles Crews and PO Alan Nations.
Officer
Nations stated that at 9:20 p.m., he and Officer
Crews were in the Coast Guard vessel and were
approaching the Ryan brothers in their boat. “One
fisherman was there beside the boat. From 50 yards I
saw the light lighting up the boat. It was a dim
light, moving in a straight line in a northwesterly
direction at four to six knots. When we got directly
over it, I could see that there was a light amber
light source about four inches long which cast an
oval-shaped beam straight ahead for four, five, or
six feet. Beneath the four-inch light source and
attached to it was a metallic rod a couple of feet
long and about four inches wide.” Nations and Crews
tried beating the object with boat oars and hooks,
but it went out and reappeared 20 yards away. “The
Ryan brothers chased it around in their boat and
reached it again before we did. They beat it with
their oars,” said Nations.
Crews also
described observing the light coming up from the
water and onto the Ryans’ boat as the Coast Guard
vessel approached. “Three boats started chasing it,”
Crews explained. “Each boat tried to get on top of
it. Then it was under all three boats. I looked down
and saw a metallic object three feet long, three or
four inches wide, and shiny like stainless steel. It
went 20 or 30 yards, then went out. Then it lit up
again on the same course and we tried to hit it with
oars. The light went out and then it relocated
again.”
At 10 p.m. they lost it. At 8 p.m., Oct. 11, as
you are probably aware, shipyard workers Charles
Hickson and Calvin Parker were also fishing at the
Pascagoula River, when three humanoid entities with
pointed ears, wrinkled skin, and crab-like claws
reportedly abducted them into an egg-shaped
spaceship in which they were scanned by a huge glass
eye and then released. Even before Hickson had
passed a lie detector test, University of California
engineering professor Dr. James Harder had concluded
that the entities are cosmic anthropologists.
Is it
possible that these Pascagoula entities are studying
our Navy’s nuclear ships?
This reference: Newspaper article from “The
REGISTER”, Pascagoula, Miss., Nov. 14, 1973,
P.1-2. From George Fawcett’s file on UFO’s at
sea. With thanks to CUFOS.
ALSO
Far from the
waters of the mythical Bermuda Triangle, where fact
and fiction often mix to produce a spine-tingling
air and sea tale, the waters near the city of
Pascagoula, Mississippi, had their own "other world"
mystery, which made national headlines twice within
three weeks. On October 11, two on-shore fishermen
(Hickson and Parker) were allegedly abducted by an
interloper descending on them from the air, and on
November 6, four offshore fishermen, later joined by
the Coast Guard, encountered a strange submerged
object. Concerned, the Navy made a thorough
investigation.
Not
depending on the press story for all the facts, I
called Raymond Ryan, one of the fishermen who chose
to do battle with the submerged craft, and the Coast
Guard in Pascagoula, who were called to investigate
and also got into the action. Chief Bob Pace, on
duty at the Coast Guard office, was cooperative and
permitted me to talk with the two crewmen who, like
Ryan, challenged the evasive USO with an oar.
Raymond
Ryan, a fisherman in the Pascagoula waters all his
life, said he made his living netting mullet and
trout. Ryan related that he and his brother, Rayme,
each accompanied by a son, had gone out to the
brackish waters every night in the past week, and,
encouraged by their big catch on the night of
November 5, looked forward to a bigger haul on the
sixth.
Instead of
mullet and trout, the Ryans found a submerged
metallic monster. In dark, shallow waters, said
Raymond, he and his son, Earl, were in one boat, and
his brother, Rayme, and his son, Rayme, Jr., were in
another, all preparing to net. Suddenly he heard his
brother, Rayme, shouting from his boat beckoning him
to "come quick." Near Rayme's boat they all
witnessed an underwater bright light in less than
ten feet of water.
Raymond and
his son gained quickly on the submerged light in
their fast boat, using a high-powered outboard
motor. As they approached, the light dimmed.
Curious, Raymond first poked his long oar into the
water. No response. Then he heftily swung his oar
from overhead into the water. To his dismay, the
light went out.
For a while
the Ryans played a cat-and-mouse game, the light
dimming when they were close, blacking out when
poked at, only to reappear in super-brilliance
elsewhere in the shallow waters. In the next close
encounter, Ryan had a good look at the submerged
craft. "It was large," he said, "maybe more than
nine feet in diameter, and it was round and
metallic,"
Ryan said
there was no question in his mind about the craft's
metallic structure. "It looked like the rounded top
of a parachute, with lines like ribs running from a
dark hump in the center," he said, "and the lines
went down as far as I could see to the outer rim."
Ryan added,
"The whole object glowed a milkish white, and, when
the light was on, it glowed above the water." When
the Coast Guard boat came, he said the light headed
for the channel, which goes into the gulf. "It's
ninety feet deep there," said Ryan, "and whoever
controlled it knew where the deep water was, to get
away."
With so few
close-encounter cases on record of man versus "USO,"
I was especially interested in questioning Ryan for
his awareness of any electromagnetic or
physiological effects occurring either during or
after the incident. He assured me that he and others
in the Ryan family suffered no ill effects, that the
object made no audible sound, that his boat did not
pitch or roll or vibrate, or have its engine stop or
falter, and that he saw no wake or eddying on the
water's surface during all the maneuvers.
Ryan,
however, did have two disappointments: one, during
the close encounter with the USO, he had the urge to
strip off his clothes and jump into the water to get
a good eyeball-to-eyeball look, but, upon seeing a
young lady aboard a boat near shore, changed his
mind, letting his modesty prevail; the other, when
he resumed fishing after the object and the Coast
Guard boat left the area, he found that the mullet
and trout had also disappeared. "I caught no fish
that night or the next," he said. "The thing scared
all the fish away!"
When the
Coast Guard's 16-foot Fiberglas runabout arrived on
the scene with Boatswain's Mates Nations and Crews
aboard, the "USO" was again pursued. During this
stage of action, according to Ryan, the submerged
object was in about ninety feet of channel water
that led into the gulf. Luckily, I was able to reach
BM3 Charles Crews, on duty at the Coast Guard
headquarters following the incident, for a firsthand
account of his experience.
Crews told
me that on the night of November 6, he was asked by
Boatswain's Mate 2/C Nations to check out a possible
submerged UFO. He reported to the radio room, where
he met Ryan and his son, who related their sighting
of a strange underwater object.
At 9:45 P.M.
Crews and Nations were aboard their sixteen-foot
Fiberglas Coast Guard runabout on the way to the
site where the submerged object was last seen.
About fifty
yards away, Crews said, he could see another boat
with a man gesturing, trying to attract his
attention. As the runabout approached, he could see
what appeared to be the man shining a large light
into the water. However, as Crews and Nations got
closer they were surprised to see that the light was
coming up from the water. The light, he said,
reflected off the front portion of the boat and the
lower half of the man. The light was motionless at
first, said Crews, but when two other fishing boats
approached the area, it began to move in a straight
course at about four to six knots.
Crews said
that he tried to run up on the light from behind but
could not because of the interference from the other
boats. When he did manage to get closer, he got a
good look. The light was about three feet by four
feet and oval-shaped. As it passed under the fishing
boats, he said he could see that the light was
reflecting off a metallic object! Then all the boats
followed the object, which Crews observed was still
moving at the same speed and on the same course.
Said Crews:
"We tried to make contact with it by using oars. One
thing of interest here; when we put the oar into the
beam of light, it appeared that the light penetrated
the oars. The oar didn't cast any shadow. I could
not block out any of the light. I would compare it
with an X ray."
Crews then
observed that the light traveled several yards
farther and blinked out. The boats, he said, sat
still for about two minutes; then suddenly the light
reappeared about thirty yards away, still on the
same course and traveling at the same rate of speed.
They again gave chase in the runabout, but the light
dimmed and went out. Crews said he and Nations
returned to their station at 11:00 p.m. Crews
confirmed Ryan's testimony about no fish being
caught that night after the object was sighted.
Boatswain's
Mate Crews sent me two drawings of the submerged
object [NOTE: sketches were not included in the
book-CF-]. Figure 1 shows the object as it appeared
passing beneath the Coast Guard boat. Figure 2 shows
a brief, 2-second sighting of the USO.1 Crews
comments, "This observation occurred at the time we
first came upon the light from behind. In the
drawing of a fin-like protrusion, the light seemed
to be coming from beneath the object. The edges of
the object seemed to be blacked out by a shadow
running completely around it. However, the rest of
the object appeared to be reflecting the light. I
reported this description to the Navy debriefing
team who interviewed me."
Shortly
after the encounter with the USO, fisherman Ryan
disclosed that he was "told" instead of "asked" to
appear before three Naval Intelligence officers who
arrived at the Coast Guard headquarters from Panama
City Naval Base. One was a high-ranking officer, he
said; another was in plain clothes. Said Ryan, "I
was being taped while the man in plain clothes took
notes of everything I said."
The USO
incident in Pascagoula waters remains unexplained.
The two investigating Naval officers from Panama
City offered no clues; nor the plain-clothes man,
reportedly from "some" government agency. Certainly
if these emissaries from Intelligence had some
notion that the USO was a secret U.S. naval device
they would not have made the trip to involve Ryan.
Ryan's testimony would have been redundant. Also, it
seems foolish to entertain the notion that a secret
submarine device, manually or remotely controlled,
would dare to enter shallow, heavily trafficked
fishing waters, risking entrapment on sand bars or
causing potential hazards to fishermen.
Not far from
Ryan's underwater encounter and the nearby shoreline
where Charles Hickman and Calvin Parker were
abducted, the Navy was reportedly preparing to
launch the U.S.S. Spruance, the first of a new fleet
of multimission destroyers with highly sophisticated
electronics. The Spruance was being built at the
Ingalls Shipyard, and there are other shipbuilding
facilities in the Pascagoula area, including a large
nuclear facility operated by Litton Industries for
the U. S. Navy. Perhaps USOs, like their aerial
counterpart, the UFO, may have more than a casual
interest in nuclear installations. As far back as
1952, a Project Bluebook report and map with
indicator pins were released that showed that UFOs
were seen preponderantly in the critical areas of
nuclear development in the U.S.A.
This reference: Situation Red, The UFO Siege! By
Leonard H. Stringfield, pp. 107-110, © 1977
Note1: Boatswain's Mate Charles Crews's drawings
of unidentified submarine object in waters of
Pascaguola, Mississippi.
UFOCAT PRN 102888 [DOS: 11-06-1973]
UFOCAT URN 102888 Newspaper Clipping, Arkansas
Gazette, November 08, 1973
UFOCAT URN 084996 UFO Register by Delair J
Bernard, 1974-#972, © Contact Int’l (UK)
UFOCAT URN 110170 Situation Red: The UFO Siege
by Leonard Stringfield, p. 133, © 1977
UFOCAT URN 134250 A Geo-Bibliography of
Anomalies by George Eberhart, #0396, © 1980
UFOCAT PRN 102891 [DOS: 11-07-1973]
UFOCAT URN 102891 Newspaper Clipping, November
08, 1973
UFOCAT URN 084999 UFO Register by Delair J
Bernard, 1974-#977, © Contact Int’l (UK).
UFOCAT URN 085318 The New UFO Sightings by
Glenn McWane, p. 24, © 1974
UFOCAT PRN 110169 [DOS: 11-06-1973]
UFOCAT URN 075002 UFO Nachtrichten, January
1974
UFOCAT URN 110169 Situation Red: The UFO Siege
by Leonard Stringfield, p. 131, © 1977
UFOCAT URN 166857 *U* UFO Computer Database by
Larry Hatch, # XXXXXX © 2002
North America United States, Mississippi,
Jackson
Pascagoula
River
Latitude 30-20-39 N, Longitude 88-34-03 W (D-M-S)
Reference: The National Gazetteer of the United
States of America, Prepared by the U.S. Geological
Survey in cooperation with the U.S. Board on
Geographic Names, Washington D.C., 1990
UFO Location (UFOCAT) Latitude 30.40 N, Longitude
88.59 W (D.%)
Latitude 30.38 N, Longitude 88.55 W [URN 110170,
75002 & 110169]
Latitude 30.33 N, Longitude 88.60 W [URN 116857]
|