Form: 97 INF
Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 14:36:09 -0600
From: Francis Ridge <nicap@insightbb.com>
Subject: The Robertson Panel, 1953; A
Corrected Brief Summary
Source: CUFON, Brad Sparks
Distribution: CE, SHG, NCP
CUFON posted the text version of this report several years ago
which makes internet searches possible.
Brad Sparks had obtained the full declassification of the Robertson
Panel Report and Durant Memo by the CIA with all sanitized redactions
filled in, in 1974-5. The Panel met Jan 14-17, not 14-18, 1953.
The
Durant Memo (or Report) to the CIA director of the Office of Scientific
Intelligence, Dr. H. Marshall Chadwell, has a typo in the memo subject
heading/title saying "14-18," thus the erroneous dates. The following
report has been updated.
Report of Scientific Advisory Panel on Unidentified Flying Objects
Convened by Office of Scientific Intelligence, CIA. (Credit: CUFON)
The Air Force had earlier commissioned the Battelle Memorial
Institute to scientifically study the various UFO reports collected by
Project Sign, Project Grudge and Project Blue Book, but Battelle
insisted they needed more time to conduct a proper study. The CIA
thought the question so pressing that it sent a group to Project Blue
Book on Dec. 12, 1952. (See
1952 UFO Chronology) The
CIA
agreed with Battelle and tried to
postpone the Robertson Panel for several months but got overruled by
the AF which insisted on an immediate convening of the panel.
The Robertson Panel first met formally on January 14, 1953 under
the direction of Howard Percy Robertson. He was a physicist, a CIA
employee and director of the Defense Department Weapons Systems
Evaluation Group (WSEG).
Other panel members were respected scientists and military
personnel who had worked on other classified military projects or
studies. Ruppelt's notes indicate that Robertson and Alvarez were
initially pro-UFO and their pro-UFO comments can actually be found in
the Durant Memo. By the end of the Panel fiasco, set up by the AF
with phony IFO cases masqueraded as UFO Unknowns, they turned skeptical
too.
ROBERTSON PANEL MEMBERS
H. P. Robertson, cosmologist physicist, Panel Chairman
Luis W. Alvarez, physicist (and later, a Nobel Prize winner),
University of California, Berkeley
Samuel A. Goudsmit, Brookhaven National Laboratories physicist
Thornton L. Page, astrophysicist, deputy director of the
Operations Research Office, Johns Hopkins University.
Lloyd V. Berkner*, physicist, Carnegie Institution
ASSOCIATE PANEL MEMBERS
Frederick C. Durant, III, CIA OSI missile expert, an Associate
Member of the Panel not a full member or signer; acted as Panel
Secretary taking the minutes and notes.
J. Allen Hynek, astronomer at Ohio State, Associate Member of the
Panel, not a full member or signer.
*(Sparks: Berkner came so late that he was in effect a non-entity
and Ruppelt could not get a fix on whether he was pro or
anti-UFO. Durant tried to make up for Berkner's absence by
peppering his long memo with Berkner's comments so that his views were
better represented.)
Formal Meetings
The Panel had four consecutive days of formal meetings.
The first day, they viewed two amateur motion pictures of UFO's:
the 1950 Montana UFO Film and 1952 Utah UFO Film (the latter taken by
Navy Chief Petty Officer Delbert C. Newhouse, who had extensive
experience with aerial photography). Two Navy photographic analysts,
Lt. Robert S. Neasham and Navy civilian Harry W. Woo, both of NavPIC
(Naval Photographic Interpretation Center), then reported their
conclusions: the two films depicted objects that were not any known
aircraft, birds or natural phenomena. Air Force Capt. Edward J. Ruppelt
then began a summary of Air Force efforts regarding UFO studies, which
had to be finished the next morning.
(Note: Brad Sparks was the only researcher ever to interview Woo,
who died in 1976. Woo had joined the CIA, in its highly secret
Technical Services Division of the Clandestine Service working on spy
cameras, several months after the Robertson Panel. Woo was still
angry decades later at how the Panel scientists mistreated him and he
praised Hynek for "sticking up" for him.)
The second day, Ruppelt finished his presentation. Hynek then
discussed the Battelle study, and the panel discussed with Air Force
personnel the problems inherent in monitoring UFO sightings. In
the afternoon, AF Lt Col Frederic C. E. Oder, on assignment to CIA OSI,
gave a briefing on the 1950-1 Project Twinkle, when he had been in a
supervisory role in the AF Cambridge Research Lab.
(Sparks: Oder falsely asserted that nothing had ever been
photographed by Project Twinkle except for "two frames" supposedly
showing "nothing distinguishable" [Durant Memo p. 16]. In fact
several phototheodolite tracking camera films had been taken of UFO's,
on April 27, May 24, and Aug. 31, 1950, and in the first incident a
triangulation was obtained of 4 UFO's about 30 feet in size flying at
150,000 feet. The existence of these White Sands UFO films was
carefully concealed from the CIA. Despite Col Oder's assignment
to the CIA his loyalty remained with the AF as did Ruppelt and Fournet,
not one of whom breathed a word about the existence of these AF Project
Twinkle tracking films proving the existence of UFO's with
scientifically measurable data. On March 29, 1992, I actually got a
chance to confront the eminent Dr. Oder, the black-projects spy
satellite director for the AF and Lockheed for many years. Oder
repeated the nonsense about Project Twinkle finding nothing. I
retorted that that was flatly not true, that in April 1950 two
theodolite stations had triangulated a UFO at 150,000 feet. Oder
seemed a bit taken aback, paused a moment as if to settle on a response
then admitted that UFO's could be some unexplained phenomenon.)
The third day, Dr. Hynek presented his pro-UFO scientific paper
delivered at the Optical Society of America on Oct 11, 1952 (later
published in the Journal of the OSA). Dewey J. Fournet spoke to
the panel on the year he had spent coordinating UFO affairs for the
Pentagon. Fournet supported the extraterrestrial hypothesis as the best
explanation for some puzzling UFO reports based on his study of
intelligently-guided motions in 17 cases he had selected (this was the
study approved and sent up the chain of command to AF Director of
Intelligence, Maj. Gen. John Samford, at around this time, in Jan.
1953).
(Sparks: The 15 months of Fournet cited mistakenly in the
Durant Memo were not his 11 months as UFO Project Monitor, from Feb.
1952 to Jan. 1953, but Fournet's total time in AF Intelligence.)
For the remainder of the third day, the panel discussed their
conclusions, and Robertson agreed to draft a preliminary report.
Berkner finally showed up for the first time, in the afternoon of this
3rd day, when the Panel was almost over.
The fourth and final day, the panel rewrote and finalized their
report.
The Robertson Panel's informal comments in the Durant memo
concluded that "most" UFO sightings could be readily identified with
conventional aircraft, balloons, astronomical, or natural phenomena,
and that the remaining UFO reports could, in all likelihood, be
similarly explained with detailed study. (p. 6 of Durant Memo).
Furthermore, the Panel suggested the Air Force should begin a
"debunking" effort to reduce "public gullibility" and demystify UFO
reports. The panel suggested a public relations campaign, using
psychiatrists, astronomers and assorted celebrities to significantly
reduce public interest in UFO's. It was also recommended that the mass
media be used for the debunking, including influential media giants
like Walt Disney Corporation.
Their formal recommendation stated "That the national security
agencies take immediate steps to strip the Unidentified Flying Objects
of the special status they have been given and the aura of mystery they
have unfortunately acquired."
Also recommended that the government monitor civilian groups
studying or researching UFO's "because of their potentially great
influence on mass thinking ... the apparent irresponsibility and
possible use of such groups for subversive purposes should be kept in
mind."
It is commonly believed today that the Robertson Panel's
conclusions and recommendations had a great influence on official
United States policy regarding UFO's for many decades. (Sparks:
The Robertson Panel had zero influence and was not even known to anyone
for years, outside the few in the AF and CIA involved. No one has
ever found any orders or directives debunking UFO's that cites the
Robertson Panel, and the Panel itself had no power or authority to
issue such orders, nor did the CIA. It was the AIR FORCE that had
already established the official policy of debunking of UFO's, for
psychological warfare reasons, back on July 28, 1952, long before plans
for the Robertson Panel ever came into existence (in Dec 1952).
After being tricked by the AF into thinking that the entire UFO problem
was merely one of poor quality IFO reports, the CIA and Robertson Panel
agreed with AF debunking operations and suggested ideas how to make
them even more devastating.)
The Robertson Panel's study was classified for over 20 years. In
1954, however, Ruppelt made the first public mention of the panel in
his TRUE article, then in his 1956 book he offered an extended summary
of its proceedings. Ruppelt did not, however, note the panel members'
names, nor the government agencies represented. (Sparks: Under AF
instigation to support its efforts to derail Congressional hearings on
UFO's sought by NICAP, the 2-page Robertson Panel report was partially
declassified in 1958 in a 1-page sanitized version that concealed the
CIA's role. Behind the scenes the AF circulated the classified
Report and a retyped version of the Durant Memo to Congressional
committees in order to get them to drop the UFO subject and not hold
public hearings. )
Additional Informal Robertson Panel Meetings
Dec. 12, 1952 CIA/OSI chief Dr. Chadwell, Dr. H. P.
Robertson and Fred Durant visit Project Blue Book and Battelle's Dr.
Howard Cross
Dec. 30, 1952 Robertson and Thornton Page meet at CIA
for UFO briefings (approx. date)
Jan. 28, 1953 Some Panel Members (probably
Robertson, Page and perhaps Berkner) meet informally with CIA/OSI in a
"rump session" to postmortem the UFO Panel proceedings, review the
new agency NSA recently established with help of OSI deputy chief Ralph
Clark (unrelated to UFO's)
July-Aug 1953 Project Blue Book acting chief Lt. Robert
M. Olsson sends some selected new UFO cases to Robertson Panel members
as a followup review to see if any change in conclusions was warranted
(no change resulted)